Arvind Kejriwal Bail Hearing Live
Updates: SC refuses Delhi CM's plea for
interim bail, issues notice to CBI
Aug 14, 2024, 12:17:51
By M.K.Karikalsozhan Blog Reporter
The legal battles surrounding Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal continue to unfold as the Supreme Court of India has refused his plea for interim bail in the high-profile liquor policy case. The case, spearheaded by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), revolves around allegations of corruption under the Prevention of Corruption Act. Kejriwal, who has been seeking bail on the grounds that his co-accused have already been granted similar relief, now faces a more challenging legal road ahead.
**Supreme Court's Decision and Its Implications**
In a significant development during today's hearing, the Supreme Court, represented by Justices Surya Kant and Ujjal Bhuyan, declined to grant interim bail to Arvind Kejriwal. The bench also issued a notice to the CBI, requesting a response by August 23rd. This decision is a critical setback for Kejriwal, as his legal team, led by senior advocate A M Singhvi, had hoped for a more favourable outcome, citing health concerns and previous interim bail granted in related cases.
**Legal Context: CBI's Role and Previous Bail Grants**
The case in question is part of a larger investigation into the Delhi government's excise policy, which has been under scrutiny for alleged corruption. Earlier, Kejriwal was granted interim bail in a money laundering case by a bench headed by Justice Sanjiv Khanna, while his co-accused, Manish Sisodia, received bail in a related case. Despite these precedents, the Supreme Court's refusal to extend the same interim relief to Kejriwal highlights the complexity and seriousness of the allegations.
**Kejriwal's Defence and the "Insurance Arrest" Claim**
During the hearing, Kejriwal's counsel, Singhvi, argued that the arrest by the CBI was an "insurance arrest," timed strategically as Kejriwal was on the verge of securing bail in a more stringent case under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA). The defence contends that the CBI's actions were not only unnecessary but also politically motivated, aimed at derailing Kejriwal's political career.
**Future Proceedings and Political Ramifications**
With the next hearing scheduled for August 23rd, all eyes are on how the Supreme Court will handle the ongoing bail plea. The political ramifications of this case are significant, given Kejriwal's position as the Chief Minister of Delhi and a prominent figure in the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP). The denial of interim bail could be seen as a blow to his political standing, while the eventual outcome of the case may have far-reaching consequences for his future in Indian politics.
**The Bigger Picture: Political Persecution or Legal Accountability?**
Arvind Kejriwal has repeatedly claimed that he is being targeted for political reasons, facing "persecution and harassment" despite his role as a sitting Chief Minister and national convenor of a major political party. He has criticised the Delhi High Court's decision to deny him bail, arguing that the evidence against him is either hearsay or coerced statements from co-accused individuals. However, the courts have so far upheld the actions of the CBI, indicating that the legal process will continue to play out.
As the case progresses, the public and media alike are closely monitoring each development. The outcome of this case will not only impact Kejriwal's political future but also set a precedent for how similar cases are handled in India's legal and political landscape. For now, Arvind Kejriwal remains in custody, awaiting the next chapter in this high-stakes legal drama.
LG Chooses Delhi Minister Kailash Gahlot, Not Atishi, to Hoist Flag on August 15, AAP AgreesIn a recent development, the Lieutenant Governor (LG) of Delhi has selected Delhi Minister Kailash Gahlot, not Atishi, to hoist the national flag on August 15, a decision that has drawn attention across the capital. The move, which comes just days before India’s Independence Day, has been acknowledged and agreed upon by the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP), signifying a moment of unity amid the often complex political dynamics of the city.
The decision to have Kailash Gahlot, and not Atishi, perform the ceremonial duty on August 15 is seen as a strategic choice by the LG. Gahlot, who holds the portfolio of Transport and Revenue in the Delhi government, has been a prominent figure within AAP and has garnered a reputation for his administrative capabilities. This year’s Independence Day celebration in Delhi is particularly significant, as it marks a moment of reflection on the city’s governance and the roles of its key leaders.
AAP’s decision to agree with the LG's choice of Kailash Gahlot, not Atishi, to hoist the flag, demonstrates a calculated acceptance. Atishi, who is also a senior minister in the Delhi government, has been a significant player in the party’s educational reforms and is widely respected for her contributions. Her exclusion from this year's flag-hoisting ceremony, however, has been met with little resistance, indicating a tactical acquiescence by the party.
The decision to choose Kailash Gahlot, and not Atishi, to hoist the flag on August 15 also underscores the importance of maintaining a balance within the party ranks. By accepting the LG’s choice, AAP is likely aiming to project a united front, especially in light of the upcoming political challenges that the party may face. Gahlot’s selection could also be seen as a recognition of his role in handling critical portfolios, particularly during challenging times, such as the COVID-19 pandemic.
Moreover, the agreement by AAP to have Kailash Gahlot, not Atishi, hoist the flag on August 15, reflects a broader understanding of the symbolic nature of the event. Independence Day is a moment of national pride, and the flag-hoisting ceremony is a significant occasion that goes beyond individual ambitions. By aligning with the LG’s decision, AAP is likely focusing on the larger narrative of patriotism and the spirit of independence, rather than internal party politics.
In conclusion, the LG's decision to choose Delhi Minister Kailash Gahlot, not Atishi, to hoist the flag on August 15, and AAP’s agreement to it, is a move that reflects the intricacies of Delhi’s political landscape. It highlights the importance of strategic decision-making and the ability to present a unified stance, particularly on occasions of national significance. As Delhi prepares to celebrate Independence Day, this decision serves as a reminder of the delicate balance of power and the necessity of prioritising collective over individual interests in governance.
